Over the years, software companies worldwide have worked hard to hone practices that smoothen up their software development. From Production to Deploying to Monitoring, These practices have become known as DevOps. Now you may ask, what is the need for MLOps when such software development methods exist?
In addition to the software team, machine learning ventures introduce a whole new breed of coders called data scientists. These developers tend to present a completely new big and messy piece of code, their own niche machine learning models which defy the previously set bottlenecks and DevOps practices.
MLOps is a field emerging to unify launch cycles of Data Scientists and Software Developers. We here at NimbleBox.ai would like to take readers on a journey to uncover and understand such practices involved in MLOps, that we think are ought to help while thinking from an ML perspective.
Location, location, location is the game's name for real estate. On the other hand, machine learning is all about data, excellent data, and even better data! Machine learning algorithms rely on data for training and what you put is what you get (WYPIWYG).
Data Pipeline in Action
A promising data pipeline ensures a unified source of ground truth, which can be viewed through dashboards, enabling authors to get insights into various parameters that test your model's efficacy in the wild.
Let us look at some steps involved in an ideal Data Pipeline:
Let us now look at some of the critical tips to be followed while implementing these steps.
What is a premium location without a beautiful piece of architecture standing on top of it? Or, in the language of CSVs and JSONs, what is a well-annotated clean piece of data if a Model doesn’t adopt it and produce results?
However, the traditional methods of Perceptrons and Neocognitrons are not something that will make your Tesla work. Bigger data means more features to explore which in turn means a deeper understanding of the information, which brings us to Deep Learning. You may wonder, classical Machine Learning has been around for 70+ years, so why suddenly go for Deep Learning, let us look at why?
Classical | Deep Learning | |
---|---|---|
Data Dependency | The carefully engineered methods tend to perform better on smaller data but fall shy of DL methods with an abundance of data. | With the layers going deeper than ever on the shoulders of Computer Power, DL Methods require a large amount of data to shine. |
Ease of use | The specifically engineered modules are designed to give faster results with minimum use of hardware. | State-of-the-art Deep Learning models may sometimes even require weeks to train, with a plethora of resources. |
Interpretability | Classical ML Methods like decision trees can be interpreted easily by assessing the crisp rules that dictate why it chose what it chose. | Deep Learning methods make it quite difficult to track what neuron or layer is responsible for a certain result. |
Examples | Linear Regression, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, SVMs, K-Means, KNNs, XGBoost | CNNs, RNNs, GANs, LSTMs, Autoencoders |
Let us continue this trend of easy to compare specifics for your ML Model Development and decide what way should the actual code be developed according to the requirements:
Notebooks | Scripting | |
---|---|---|
Experimentation | Building basic algorithms is way easier in Notebooks as they can produce output then and there. | Scripting enables you to remove a function by commenting out the line without breaking the code, but with the addition of running instances and dependant ones for every iteration. |
Debugging | Variable sharing in Notebooks tends to make finding bugs difficult. | Having scripts enables you to single out functions producing errors or even use tools like pdp. |
Simplicity of Understanding | Notebooks are easier to read, understand and share, with the markdown support for documentation. | As far as documentation goes, scripts only give you access to code comments that may not be the most intricate. |
Can you think of the number of projects and ideas that you came up with during your ML Journey, that you thought will take the world by storm? What didn’t allow you to do so, ever thought about that?
Deployment, the action of bringing resources into effective action, is a process where most ideas and concepts smother out. Stemming from the fact that the contrast between perfect lab conditions and the real raw world is far and wide.
Machine Learning models with their overwhelming amount of data and the astounding amount of computing demands some special types of deployment techniques than normal software, let us take a look at some of them:
Deploying a machine learning model to the real world suddenly exposes it to technical, physical, and computational data and work. This, in turn, gives birth to the need to have a systematic pipeline in the bank to monitor and course correct the model parameters for smooth deployment.
In the era of microservices, all software asks for multiple API endpoints aided by intricate Kubernetes tasks that can communicate a deployed software's current state. This, however, takes a rather difficult turn when implemented on Machine Learning models. This is because ML Applications tend not only to want to serve requests but also to store and analyze them, which requires a large team to build and maintain.
Let us look at some of the elements that are essential for a good deployment:
You can extend the above list, but the core objective behind having such methods is to capture better data for the parameters of the ML Model and fix it over time. This is greatly aided by a speedy deployment which is essential for back-testing.
Back-Testing: a general method for seeing how well a strategy or model would have done post-deployment
The previous section focused on the necessity of monitoring and the things to be kept in mind while monitoring a deployed machine learning model. In this section, let us look at some basic tools that you can use to monitor your deployment.
Let us first take a look at some of the parameters that you may want to keep an eye on while monitoring:
Metric | Some Aspects |
---|---|
Software | Memory, Compute, Latency, Throughput, Latency |
Input Metrics | Average Input Length, Average Input Volume, Number of Missing Values, Average Image Brightness, etc. |
Output Metrics | Null Returns, Rerun of the Model on same data, High variance in Stochastic Outputs |
These parameters require intricate monitoring tools that have been iterated to meet the requirements over the years. So let us have a closer inspection at some of these tools and services.
Kubeflow: It is an Open-Sourced ML Toolkit for Kubernetes (something touched upon in the last section). Working towards maintaining ML Applications by managing and packaging Docker Containers.
Neptune: An ML metadata store to log, store, display, organize, compare and query all metadata generated during the ML model lifecycle.
Grafana: An Open-Sourced multi-platform analytics and visualization web application, equipped with modern visualization techniques for efficient model monitoring.
mlflow: An Open-Sourced platform to cater to the whole Machine Learning lifecycle that includes but isn't limited to experimentation, reproducibility, deployment, and a central model registry.
To learn more about MLOps and best practices, download The Ultimate Guide to MLOps for free!
Want to unlock $350K in cloud credits and take your ML efforts to the next level? NimbleBox.ai is here to help. We’ll help you blast through model deployment 4x faster and reduce your headache of infra management by 80%. NimbleBox makes it a breeze to develop and deploy ML models in production.
Want to learn more? Let’s discuss how NimbleBox can support your ML project.